| Fury 
              as academics are sacked for being Israeli
  By Charlotte Edwardes(Additional reporting by Tony Freinberg and James Pope)
 Daily Telegraph (UK)
 7 July 2002
    A British academic has sparked worldwide protests after sacking 
              two scholars from her highly respected international journals because 
              they are Israeli. Mona Baker, a professor at the University of Manchester Institute 
              of Science and Technology (UMIST), admitted yesterday that she had 
              dismissed Dr Miriam Shlesinger and Prof Gideon Toury because of 
              their nationality. Despite a storm of complaints raised by her action, Prof Baker 
              stood by her decision, telling The Telegraph: "I deplore the 
              Israeli state. Miriam knew that was how I felt and that they would 
              have to go because of the current situation." Prof Baker asked Dr Shlesinger and Prof Toury to resign from the 
              boards of two academic journals she owns, after signing a website 
              petition last month calling for academics to boycott Israel. When 
              they refused to resign she sacked them. The dismissals raised no public opposition from within British 
              universities. International academics, however, led by Prof Stephen 
              Greenblatt, a world-renowned Shakespeare scholar at Harvard University, 
              have now condemned the decision and called on British academics 
              to stand up for intellectual freedom.  Prof Greenblatt, who flew to England last night to collect an honorary 
              degree from London University, said that Prof Baker's actions were 
              "repellent", "dangerous" and "intellectually 
              and morally bankrupt". He described any policy of singling out a group for collective 
              punishment as "grotesque". He added: "Excluding scholars 
              because of the passports that they carry or because of their skin 
              colour, religion or political party, corrupts the integrity of intellectual 
              work." Both of the sacked scholars had worked for the periodicals for 
              three years. Dr Shlesinger, who enjoyed a friendship with Prof Baker 
              and was even a guest at her house in Manchester, worked for the 
              editorial board of The Translator. Prof Toury, who teaches at Tel 
              Aviv University, held an honorary advisory role at Translation Studies 
              Abstracts. Dr Shlesinger, a respected American-born academic at the Bar-Ilan 
              University near Tel Aviv, is also a former chairman of Amnesty International 
              in Israel and has criticised her country's policies in the West 
              Bank and the Gaza Strip. Prof Baker, who is the director of the centre for translation and 
              intercultural studies at UMIST, was unrepentant, however. Although 
              the boards of the journals remained split over the dismissals, Prof 
              Baker said: "I am not against Israeli nationals per se; it 
              is Israeli institutions as part of the Israeli state which I absolutely 
              deplore. She said that her actions were "my interpretation of what 
              a boycott of Israel means". Prof Baker added: "Many people 
              in Europe have signed a boycott against Israel. Israel has gone 
              beyond just war crimes.  It is horrific what is going on there. Many of us would like to 
              talk about it as some kind of Holocaust which the world will eventually 
              wake up to, much too late, of course, as they did with the last 
              one." She conceded, however, that the pair would not have been sacked 
              had they lived in Britain and severed their ties with Israeli institutions. The petition that Prof Baker signed claims that Israel should be 
              boycotted because it is "racist." Prof Baker, who refused 
              to disclose where she was born, claimed that her actions were supported 
              by a growing number of academics across Britain and in Germany. 
              She alleged that since the sackings she had been the victim of a 
              hate campaign. "My husband and I receive hate mail every day, up to 50 [letters] 
              a day, some of it extremely obscene," she said. "I can't 
              read it out it is so obscene and very threatening. It is also sent 
              to my university, to my vice-chancellor and to some of my colleagues, 
              and they threaten people who want to stay on the board. The Americans 
              are the worst offenders. "There is a large intimidation machine out there which is 
              waiting to intimidate anyone that it doesn't approve of." In an open letter to Prof Baker, however, Prof Greenblatt, the 
              president of the Modern Language Association of America, described 
              the "chilling shadow" cast by her actions. "An attack 
              on cultural co-operation, with a particular group singled out for 
              collective punishment violates the essential spirit of scholarly 
              freedom and the pursuit of truth," he wrote. "The pursuit of knowledge does not suddenly come to a halt 
              at national borders. This does not mean that serious scholars must 
              be indifferent to the world's murderous struggles, but it does mean 
              that they are committed to an ongoing, frank conversation . . . 
              [that] often includes passionate disagreement." The letter is understood to have the backing of other senior academics 
              at Harvard. Following calls from The Telegraph, a number of leading 
              academics in Britain lent their voice to Prof Greenblatt's condemnation. Francis Robinson, a professor of history at London University, 
              said: "Whatever anyone feels about Israel, this is absolutely 
              appalling. Certainly there are strong feelings, not often spoken 
              but nevertheless strongly felt, shared by the majority of British 
              liberal intellectuals about the problems with Israel. Nonetheless, 
              this sounds dreadful. It runs counter to the very principles of 
              academic freedom." Prof Greenblatt's intervention was welcomed by Lord Janner, the 
              chairman of the Holocaust Educational Trust. He said that the sackings 
              set a worrying precedent: "This is disgraceful and dangerous. 
              You should no more sack an Israeli academic for his nationality 
              than you should a Palestinian in the same situation. "I do not buy this argument that, just because there are more 
              fee-paying Arab students at UMIST and elsewhere, their views should 
              prevail. In every university in the UK today there are problems 
              between the two groups. They must try to insulate themselves from 
              what is happening in the Middle East or else you are going to get 
              the most terrible conflicts seeping into our university campuses." Prof John Garside, the vice-chancellor of UMIST, distanced himself 
              from the debate. Even though Prof Baker uses UMIST's logo in her 
              promotional material for the journals, he said: "The position 
              of UMIST is that the two journals Prof Baker is involved with have 
              nothing to do with UMIST. "These are activities that she is involved with in her own 
              time. What happens on those journals and the editorial policy on 
              those journals are entirely a matter for those journals. It's an 
              issue that we are dealing with internally and not something I want 
              to make any public statement about at this stage." A spokesman for the Israeli embassy said: "We think the Palestinian 
              cause is not helped in any way by people trying to shut down those 
              who communicate across boundaries through dialogue and the exchange 
              of ideas. It's the rejection of the legitimacy of the state of Israel 
              itself which lies at the core of the Israeli-Arab conflict."   |