Innovative Minds © 2014. All Rights Reserved. www.inminds.co.uk
|
[Iran] We need to kill him
Uri Orbach, Yediot Achronot (Ynetnews) 20 April 2007  Uri Orbach - calling for the murder of President Ahmadinejad 
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has to be killed. Really be killed, I mean, physically. He should be eliminated, put to death, assassinated, and all those words that serve to say the same thing. 
Uri Orbach, Yedioth Group
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has to be killed. Really be killed, I mean, physically. He should be eliminated, put to death, assassinated, and all those words that serve to say the same thing.
Former Mossad Director Meir Amit said this explicitly in a recent interview with the "Kfar Chabad" weekly. It is indeed a very impolite way to express our disgust with the Iranian archenemy. Government officials, including ones who have retired already, usually merely hint at such matters - that is, if they choose to talk about them at all.
And still, Meir Amit is right. Here too, while we are so busy with manners and etiquette, the man in Teheran is vigorously advancing the extermination plan for the people of Israel.
Since at this time he is personally responsible for Iran's nuclear program, and since he is ignoring the insistent pleading, various pressures, persuasion attempts and temptations, an attempt should be made to eliminate him.
Rules of etiquette must change
The importance of Meir Amit's words at this stage is particularly related to changing the rules of etiquette. After all, this is not the customary way to speak about an enemy when it comes to diplomatic language.
Yet a return to a violent and threatening mode of expression towards figures such as Ahmadinejad, our regional Hitler, may serve to grant legitimacy to governments and their operational arms to seek this objective without fear.
These personal threats may indeed serve to frighten the man in Teheran. After all, he saw the noose tightening around former Iraqi Dictator Saddam Hussein's neck, so even if Ahmadinejad is unconcerned about Iran's fate, perhaps he will be concerned about the fate of his own neck.
Therefore, if we wish to still be here for our 70th Independence Day celebrations, we must threaten to assassinate him.
Indeed, this is impolite, unaesthetic, not customary and undiplomatic. Yet in order to stop this particular archenemy, we simply have to explain to him that his end is nearing.
After all, the saving of lives overrides etiquette.
Source: http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/1,2506,L-3390265,00.html
Also Of Interest
Page URL: http://inminds.com/article.php?id=10065
|
|
Support Us
If you agree with our work then please support us.
INMINDS Facebook Live Feed
Featured Video's
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.

Featured MP3 Podcast "1763 in the Ohio river valley you got Lord Jeffrey Amherst committing to written order an instruction to his subordinate Henry Bouquet, having been defeated by Pontiac Ottawa confederacy in the field. The order essentially says that they have been defeated militarily and is therefore necessary for Amherst forces to request a peace, to sue for peace from Pontiacs people. He instructs Bouquet to convene a parlay with the Indian leadership for that purpose. And as is the custom, as is common courtesy among native populations as was known to the Brits at that time, it would be necessary for those who requested the council to give gifts to those requested to attend. Make those gifts, Amherst says, items taken from a smallpox infirmary in order, I'm going to quote directly now, this isn't a paraphrase: 'in order that we may extirpate this execrable race'. Now key is on this last word, had he said that we might eradicate the opposing combatants, their military capacity, their warriors.. what ever term he wanted to use, it would have been biological warefare. But he didn't say anything about that, he said the 'race'. His intent was to use biological means, to use disease, quite explicitly so, to eradicate an entire population group. And Bouquet was also kind enough to commit to writing in his response the next day, I have done as instructed, dispersing three blankets, two handkerchiefs and sundry other items, hopefully, he says, they will have the desired result. They did.. the lowest estimate of the number of people who died of smallpox as a result of that little gesture of friendship and goodwill is a 100,000!" American Indian scholar, activist in the struggle for liberation of Indigenous Peoples in America On the publication of the book 'A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas, 1492 to the Present', 1997 [29min / 10Mb] [need flash]

Boycott Israel Campaign 
|
|